[cedarforest]

Roe, it is obvious that you are NOT reading my posts, or you are putting words in my mouth, that is opposite of what I'm saying. You say I admit that GSA is bad. Please reread my 1st sentence, which is totally opposite of what you say that I said. GSA is NOT sex, GSA is the attraction to one another, which includes sexual attraction, but is a FAR cry from the totality of what GSA emcompasses. The fact that you state that "those of us" who feel it is right, will continue to try to change the laws. Roe, the ONLY law is not to have sex! That's our entire difference. You feel that sex can be acceptable with close relatives, I do NOT!!! It's not about GSA, it's about where it leads. Attractions do NOT have to lead to sex. Just as in a traditional relationship, attraction does NOT mean sex will happen. Just as you stated that sex has happened forever, but so has fidelity & chasity. I'll admit that it is not the norm now, but in the past, it was much more so. The sexual revolution, has caused the magnitude of many many problems, that weren't nearly as prevalent, as in the past. One of those problems/issues, is GSA.

But, the point is, PLEASE read my posts & quote me properly. You absolutely missed my whole point, that I tried so hard to make. GSA IS Good, when sex is avoided, but apparently, to you, GSA & sex are inseparatable--cedarforest